its holding company Maplebear Inc and remove any material that Maplebear inc finds problem with tarnishing their image OR Submit Domain to Maplebear Inc in case the Registrar or any committee set by Registrar who is acting as Arbitration tells us

Name See Oki Data Americas Inc v ASD Inc WIPO Case No D2001-0903 T he fact that a domain name wholly incorporates a Complainant's registered mark is sufficient to establish identity or confusing similarity for purposes of the Policy despite the

name See Vicar Operating Inc v Domains by Proxy Inc / Eklin Bot Systems Inc WIPO Case No D2010-1141 seealso Nicole Kidman v John Zuccarini d/b/a Cupcake Party WIPO Case No D2000-1415 Inter-Continental Hotels Corporation v Khaled Ali Soussi

IBM trademark since it includes the trademark IBM and the word teknoloji which means technology in Turkish language The Complainant states that IBM is a technology company and argues that the presence of the word teknoloji would increase the

without authorization See e.g Apple Inc v Domain Admin Private Whois ipodhack.com Private Whois iphine.com Private Whois macbookpros.com WIPO Case No D2011-1390 transferring the domain name www.appleipods.com which was comprised of a combination of

with complainant that it was inconceivable that respondent could have registered microsoft247.com without actual knowledge of the MICROSOFT mark given its fame and notoriety Microsoft Corp v OzGrid Business Applications FA 314308 FORUM Oct 6 2004

In some jurisdictions including Italy the term Gorgonzola is a denomination of origin which is recognized officially for designating products originating from certain territories and including certain characteristics The Complainant is the

SERVIER in its entirety The incorporation of Complainant s SERVIER trademark is preceded by a hyphen and also incorporates the trademark icloud which belongs to a third party namely Apple Inc Previous UDRP panels have consistently found that the

See Vertical Solutions Mgmt Inc v webnet-marketing inc FA 95095 Forum July 31 2000 holding that Respondent s failure to respond allows all reasonable inferences of fact in the allegations of the complaint to be deemed true see also Talk City Inc

Protected WhoisGuard Inc / Aubrey Macarious Cadence Concept Case No D2017-0476 1 The Parties The Complainant is Tidal Music AS of Oslo Norway represented by Pryor Cashman LLP United States of America United States The Respondent is

with 25 locations in China including Hong Kong Beijing and Shenzhen The Complainant produces OEM products for some of the leading brand owners including Apple Bosch Huawei Hyundai Panasonic and Samsung The NXP trade mark is used in connection

with 25 locations in China including Hong Kong Beijing and Shenzhen The Complainant produces OEM products for some of the leading brand owners including Apple Bosch Huawei Hyundai Panasonic and Samsung The NXP trade mark is used in connection

purposes of the proceeding Apple Inc v Stanley Pace a.k.a Jordan Smith Chris Carter sunhei.org Keith Besterson Shahamat Staci Michele and Courtney Culbertson and Fundacion Private Whois WIPO Case No D2013-1313 Pursuant to paragraph 3 c of the

mark because the domain name incorporates in its entirety Complainant s CITI mark and the CITI mark is the dominant element in Respondent s domain name See also Apple Computer Inc v Apple-Computers c/o Marcus Grey FA535416 Forum Sept 22 2005

where it substantially incorporated the Complainant s mark and that simply incorporating the Complainant s trademarks in a slightly different word sequence was not sufficient Further it is well established that in cases where the distinctive

combination in a given case including i the registrants identities including pseudonyms ii the registrants contact information including email addresses postal addresses or phone numbers iii relevant IP addresses name servers or webhosts

trademark On the contrary it increases the likelihood of confusion by emphasizing the mark as decided on the previous cases Just Wheels & Tires Co d/b/a TSW Alloy Wheels v Covanta Corporation / DNS Admin WIPO Case No D2009-1242 Apple Inc v Private

is a trade mark owned by Apple Inc In this case the AUTODESK mark forms the dominant parts of the disputed domain names The mark AUTODESK has a high degree of inherent distinctiveness being an arbitrary word with no meaning The inclusion of

multi-national websites including those reached through the domain names claro.com and clarovideo.com as well as several country-specific websites including those reached through the domain names claro.com.ar claro.com.pe claro.cr and

WIPO Verfahren Nr D2016-0112 Apple Inc v Protection Domain WIPO Verfahren Nr D2014-0187 Raiffeisen Schweiz Genossenschaft v Wildvest LLC WIPO Verfahren Nr DCH2008-0004 MasterCard International Incorporated v DL Webb WIPO-Verfahren Nr D2008-0324 F